Working Paper

Experts and Epidemics

Klaus Gründler, Niklas Potrafke
CESifo, Munich, 2020

CESifo Working Paper No. 8556

Do experts adjust their policy recommendations when the facts change? We conduct a large-scale randomized experiment among 1,224 economic experts across 109 countries that includes two treatments. The first treatment is the geographic and temporal variation in the initial spread of Covid-19 during March 2020, which we use as a natural experiment. The second is a randomly assigned information treatment that informs experts about the past macroeconomic performance of their country. We find that greater exposure to Covid-19 decreases the probability to recommend contractionary fiscal policies. A better macroeconomic performance increases the probability to implement contractionary policies and reduces the exposure effect to Covid-19. While our results show that experts adjust their policy recommendations to changing environments, sentiment analyses of open-ended questions asked after the treatment suggest that these adjustments are caused by Bayesian information updating and not by a change in preferences.

CESifo Category
Public Finance
Fiscal Policy, Macroeconomics and Growth
Keywords: epidemics, Covid-19, health, experts, fiscal preferences, randomized experiment
JEL Classification: A110, E620, H600, H630