Working Paper

Fact-Checking Politicians

Andrea Mattozzi, Samuel Nocito, Francesco Sobbrio
CESifo, Munich, 2022

CESifo Working Paper No. 10122

We investigate the reaction of Italian Members of Parliament to a rigorous fact-checking of their public statements. Our research design relies on a novel randomized field experiment in collaboration with the leading Italian fact-checking company. Our results show that politicians are responsive to negative fact-checking. Specifically, we observe a significative reduction in the number of incorrect statements made by politicians after being treated. This effect persists for at least two months. We also observe a reduction in the probability of politicians making verifiable statements, suggesting that fact-checking may also increase the ambiguity of politicians’ statements.

CESifo Category
Public Choice
Keywords: fact-checking, politicians, accountability, verifiability, ambiguity, RCR
JEL Classification: D720, D780, D800, D910